We use essential cookies to run this site. Analytics & marketing cookies load only with your consent — see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

Healthcare Provider case study hero background

Healthcare Provider: DPDP-Aligned Privacy & Security Controls

PCI SSC Qualified Security Assessor — CYBERSIGMA CONSULTING SERVICES LLP

QSA Authorised
CEMEA · Asia Pacific · USA

Executive Summary

Healthcare organisations process highly sensitive personal data across clinical, billing, and digital channels. This case study describes how CyberSigma helped a healthcare network (client name withheld under NDA) align with India’s DPDP Act while improving technical safeguards on patient-facing systems.

Client Overview

The client operates clinics and digital health services across India, handling patient records, appointments, and billing data. Legacy systems and rapid digitization created privacy and security gaps regulators and patients increasingly expect to be addressed.

  • Industry: Healthcare
  • Region: India
  • Scope: DPDPA, patient portals, EHR integrations, vendors

Challenge

Sensitive health data across multiple systems—with inconsistent consent records and limited breach readiness—increased compliance exposure and patient trust risk.

  • No enterprise RoPA or processing activity map
  • Consent and retention practices varied by department
  • Limited DPIA process for new digital features
  • Patient-facing apps lacked recent security testing
  • Incident response playbooks were outdated

Objectives

  • Operationalize DPDP-aligned privacy governance
  • Implement consent, retention, and vendor controls
  • Introduce DPIA checkpoints in SDLC and onboarding
  • Validate security of patient-facing channels through VAPT
  • Prepare breach notification and incident runbooks

Our Approach

1. Privacy Baseline & RoPA

We catalogued processing activities, lawful bases, retention, and cross-border flows—assigning accountable owners for each system.

2. DPDPA Control Implementation

Consent capture, data subject request workflows, and vendor clauses were standardised across clinical and digital teams.

3. Privacy-by-Design in SDLC

DPIA templates and release gates were embedded so new features were assessed before production deployment.

4. Technical Assurance

Targeted VAPT and configuration reviews on portals and APIs reduced exploitable weaknesses on channels handling patient data.

Solution

  • Mapped processing activities and built RoPA with accountable owners.
  • Implemented privacy-by-design checkpoints in SDLC and vendor onboarding.
  • Ran targeted VAPT and privacy assessments on patient-facing channels.
  • Published incident response and breach notification playbooks.

Results

  • Closed 95% of priority gaps within the first remediation cycle
  • Established repeatable DPIA and incident playbooks
  • Improved patient trust messaging with defensible controls
  • Executive dashboard for ongoing privacy compliance tracking

Timelines and outcomes reflect the documented engagement record for this client; results vary with scope and readiness.

What We Delivered

  • Personal-data inventory and processing map (RoPA-style)
  • Consent capture and withdrawal workflows aligned to s.6 and the 2025 Rules
  • Privacy notices in the required plain-language form
  • Data-principal rights machinery — access, correction, erasure workflows with records
  • Retention schedule aligned to s.8(7) whichever-earlier erasure, with legal-hold register
  • Breach-response procedure aligned to Rule 7 (without-delay intimation, 72-hour Board reporting)

The standard artefact set for this engagement type; per-client environment and architecture details are shared under NDA during procurement, not published.

Lessons Learned

  • The data map was the critical path: every downstream artefact — notices, consent, retention — inherited its quality from how honestly the inventory was built.
  • Deletion promised in policy but unexecutable in systems is the gap regulators will test; erasure had to be engineered end-to-end including processors, not written into a PDF.
  • Building the DPDP machinery once and mapping it to SOC 2 privacy/confidentiality criteria avoided running two parallel privacy programmes.
Facing a similar challenge?

Talk to the team that ran this engagement

This was a real DPDP Compliance & Healthcare Security Consulting engagement. If you are preparing for the same, speak to a specialist who has delivered it — not a sales rep. We will give you a clear read on your scope, gaps and the fastest path, and reply within four business hours.

Neha Abbad, Co-Founder & Chief Operating Officer
Led by our Third-party risk specialists — Neha Abbad · 10+ years in cybersecurity

Explore DPDP implementation · more case studies

Delivering from Noida · Mumbai · Bengaluru · Pune · Dubai · Cairo · Melbourne see all locations & addresses →