SigmAcademy · Role-based paths
Role-Based Security Learning Paths
Generic security training fails because the developer, the finance officer and the administrator face different threats and controls. Role-based paths teach each person the security their actual job touches — which is also exactly what auditors mean by "appropriate to role".
Why role-based beats one-size
Engineers need secure coding and secrets handling; operations needs hardening and change discipline; everyone needs phishing resistance — one course serves nobody well.
How SigmAcademy structures it
Learning paths assigned by role, built the way engagements actually run — the scenarios come from real assessment and audit practice, not stock content.
Progress you can evidence
Completion and assessment tracking per person and role — the artefact ISO 27001 A.6.3, SOC 2 CC1/CC2 and PCI 12.6 sampling asks for.
Keeping it current
Paths evolve with the threat and regulatory landscape the practice works in daily — training content with the same currency discipline as our published research.
FAQ
Which roles are covered?
Paths are organised around the roles compliance frameworks care about — technical, operational and general staff — and tailored at onboarding to your org structure.
Does completion satisfy PCI 12.6 / ISO A.6.3?
Those controls require awareness appropriate to role with records; role-based paths plus completion tracking produce exactly that evidence. The control owner remains you.
Can we add company-specific content?
Programmes are tailored during onboarding so your policies and incidents can be reflected in the paths.
See SigmAcademy on your environment
Scoped to your stack in one conversation — with the CyberSigma practice behind the platform.