SigmaReview · Reporting & mapping
OWASP, PCI & ISO Mapping — Audit-Ready Reporting
Raw scanner output is a liability in an audit: unmapped, unreproduced, untriaged. The report is the product — findings mapped to OWASP categories and the control frameworks you answer to, with evidence a QSA, ISO auditor or regulator accepts.
Mapping is what makes findings usable
A finding tagged to OWASP Top 10 / API Top 10, then to PCI DSS 6.2.4 or ISO A.8.28, answers the auditor’s actual question: which control does this prove or break?
Reproduction and evidence discipline
Findings that stand up carry reproduction steps, evidence artefacts and severity rationale — the difference between a scanner export and a report a regulator accepts.
How SigmaReview reports
Consolidated findings across SAST, DAST, API and manual VAPT in audit-ready reports mapped to OWASP, PCI DSS and ISO 27001 — one picture with retest status, not four contradicting consoles.
Certificates and attestations
For CERT-In empanelled VAPT deliverables and safe-to-host style needs, reporting follows the formats Indian regulators and enterprise procurement actually ask for.
FAQ
Which frameworks do reports map to?
OWASP Top 10 and API Security Top 10 categorisation, with control mapping to PCI DSS and ISO 27001 as published; other framework views are handled per engagement.
Do reports include retest verification?
Fix-verification is part of the reporting cycle — a finding closed without a retest record is not closed in any audit that samples it.
Will an external auditor accept these reports?
The reports are built for exactly that audience — QSAs, ISO certification auditors and Indian regulators — by a firm that also sits on the assessor side of the table.
See it on your codebase
Four engines, senior auditors, one audit-ready picture — scoped to your stack in one conversation.