We use essential cookies to run this site. Analytics & marketing cookies load only with your consent — see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

SigmaReview · SAST

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Static analysis reads your source code for insecure patterns before the application ever runs — the earliest, cheapest point to kill a vulnerability. The catch is noise: unturned SAST drowns teams in findings nobody triages. SigmaReview pairs the scanner with people who decide what actually matters.

What SAST catches — and when

Injection-prone constructs, hardcoded secrets, unsafe deserialisation, broken crypto usage and taint flows from user input to dangerous sinks — found at commit time, when the fix costs minutes instead of a release cycle.

The false-positive problem

Raw static analysis flags patterns, not exploitability. The difference between a useful programme and an ignored dashboard is triage: severity in YOUR context, reachable paths, and deduplication across scans.

How SigmaReview runs it

Automated SAST integrated into the development workflow (GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins), with findings triaged into audit-ready reports mapped to OWASP, PCI DSS and ISO 27001 expectations — and senior auditors on top for what static analysis cannot see.

Where SAST fits your compliance

PCI DSS 6.2.3 code review and 6.2.4 engineering techniques; ISO 27001 A.8.28 secure coding; SOC 2 CC8 change management — SAST evidence feeds all three when reports are structured for auditors.

FAQ

Does SAST replace manual code review?

No — it scales the mechanical part. PCI DSS explicitly accepts tool-assisted review, but business-logic flaws, auth design errors and chained issues need human review; SigmaReview combines both.

Which languages and repos does it work with?

SigmaReview integrates with GitHub, GitLab and Jenkins pipelines; language coverage is confirmed against your stack during onboarding rather than promised generically.

How do we stop SAST findings being ignored?

Gate on triaged severity, not raw counts: new-code gates in CI, an owner per finding, and reports that speak auditor language so the same work serves compliance.

DAST

See it on your codebase

Four engines, senior auditors, one audit-ready picture — scoped to your stack in one conversation.