Industries
EdTech and education — DPDP, children's data and enterprise assurance
EdTech platforms process large volumes of minors' and institutional data, which puts DPDP's heightened children's-data duties, CERT-In obligations and buyer-driven SOC 2/ISO 27001 at the centre of growth.
Applicable regulations
- DPDP Act 2023 — verifiable parental consent and heightened duties for children's data
- CERT-In directions (incident reporting, logging, empanelled testing)
- ISO 27001 ISMS and SOC 2 for institutional and enterprise buyers
- Data-localisation and privacy expectations for education data
Common cybersecurity risks
- Exposure of minors' personal data and learning records
- Weak consent and age-assurance flows under DPDP
- Account takeover across student, parent and teacher portals
- Insecure APIs and third-party integrations (payments, content, analytics)
- Breach-notification and incident-response gaps
Audit findings we typically see
- No DPDP-aligned consent, age-gating or children's-data handling
- Over-collection and long retention of student personal data
- Critical VAPT findings on web and mobile apps left unremediated
- Weak access controls and logging across multi-tenant platforms
- No CERT-In-aligned incident-response process
Services required
- DPDP compliance (children's-data duties)
- VAPT for web, mobile and APIs
- SOC 2 readiness for enterprise buyers
- ISO 27001 ISMS
- Security architecture review
Our engagement approach
- Discovery. Map personal-data flows (incl. minors'), consent and third-party integrations; confirm DPDP, CERT-In and buyer-driven obligations.
- Assessment. VAPT across web/mobile/APIs plus a DPDP and ISO 27001/SOC 2 control-gap review.
- Remediation. A prioritised roadmap covering consent/age-assurance, data minimisation, app fixes and access controls.
- Assurance. Retest, audit-grade reporting and buyer-ready assurance evidence.
Expected evidence
- Personal-data inventory and consent/age-assurance design
- VAPT reports with closure evidence
- Access-control and logging evidence across tenants
- Incident-response and breach-notification procedure
Indicative timeline
A typical engagement runs 4 to 10 weeks, depending on platform scope and frameworks.
Deliverables
- DPDP gap assessment with children's-data controls
- VAPT reports with closure evidence
- SOC 2 / ISO 27001 readiness roadmap
- Buyer-ready assurance evidence pack
Related case study
Free tool
Try it free →DPDP Readiness Checker
Check your readiness for India’s DPDP Act and see your priority gaps — free.

QSA Authorised
CEMEA · Asia Pacific · USA
Delivering from Noida · Mumbai · Bengaluru · Pune · Dubai · Cairo · Melbourne — see all locations & addresses →
