We use essential cookies to run this site. Analytics & marketing cookies load only with your consent — see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

Decision guide

SOC 1 vs SOC 2

Both are AICPA attestation reports issued by a CPA firm, but they answer different questions: SOC 1 covers the controls that affect your clients' financial reporting; SOC 2 covers how you protect their data.

SOC 1 and SOC 2 side by side
DimensionSOC 1SOC 2
What it reports onControls relevant to clients' internal control over financial reporting (ICFR)Controls against the Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy
StandardSSAE 18 (ISAE 3402 internationally)SSAE 18 / AICPA Trust Services Criteria
Who asks for itClients' finance teams and their financial auditorsClients' security, procurement and risk teams
Typical buyerPayroll, loan and claims servicers, data centres, fintech affecting client financialsSaaS, IT/ITeS, cloud and fintech handling customer data
Report typesType I (design) and Type II (operating effectiveness)Type I (design) and Type II (operating effectiveness)
Issued byAn independent licensed CPA firmAn independent licensed CPA firm
Report accessRestricted-use (service org, user entities, their auditors)Restricted-use (service org, user entities, their auditors)
They are not alternatives. A service organisation whose platform both processes financial transactions and holds customer data often needs both — and the control evidence should be collected once and reported into each.

When SOC 1 is the right report

Choose SOC 1 when your service could affect your clients’ financial statements — payroll and benefits processing, loan or claims servicing, data centres, or a platform that handles financial transactions on a client’s behalf. SOC 1 gives their auditors assurance over the controls that feed their financial reporting.

When SOC 2 leads

Choose SOC 2 when customers care about how you secure and handle their data — the usual case for SaaS, cloud and IT services. It reports against the Trust Services Criteria (security is mandatory; availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy are added as relevant) and is what procurement and security teams ask for.

When you need both

  • Map financial-reporting-relevant controls to SOC 1 objectives; map data-protection controls to the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria.
  • Reuse shared evidence (access control, change management, monitoring) once and report it into each engagement.
  • Prefer Type II for both where possible — it tests that controls actually operated over a period, which carries more weight with clients.
  • Align audit windows so remediation does not conflict.
Free tool
Free Security Assessment
Get a complimentary, no-obligation assessment from CERT-In empanelled senior auditors.
Try it free →
PCI SSC Qualified Security Assessor — CYBERSIGMA CONSULTING SERVICES LLP

QSA Authorised
CEMEA · Asia Pacific · USA

Ready to discuss your SOC 1 vs SOC 2 requirement?

CERT-In empanelled · PCI QSA authorised — a senior consultant responds within 4 business hours. Free, no obligation.

Talk to an expert →Request a scope review

Delivering from Noida · Mumbai · Bengaluru · Pune · Dubai · Cairo · Melbourne — see all locations & addresses →